<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple to Go AMD In Two Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/</link>
	<description>The technology resource you can&#039;t resist!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/#comment-14152</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re saying that AMD is &quot;years head of intel&quot;, yet intel has a quad core chip coming, like, this year.  Sure, with the move to x86 there is little to prevent them from switching to AMD either in part or in full, but there is little reasoning to make them do that over the deals they&#039;re most likely getting on the intel chips (remember that pc mini rip off that cost $100 more than the mini?) and the fact that they&#039;re most likely going to have everyone salivating over a dual processor quad core (Arachnid?) Power Mac replacement.  since the low end is also being serviced in this deal, I don&#039;t see why they would want to switch to AMD, but then again in 2 years, who knows what will happen, I mean did you see any of this coming 5 years ago?  wait g4 tower time would be a bad example... anyways that&#039;s enough ranting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying that AMD is &#8220;years head of intel&#8221;, yet intel has a quad core chip coming, like, this year.  Sure, with the move to x86 there is little to prevent them from switching to AMD either in part or in full, but there is little reasoning to make them do that over the deals they&#8217;re most likely getting on the intel chips (remember that pc mini rip off that cost $100 more than the mini?) and the fact that they&#8217;re most likely going to have everyone salivating over a dual processor quad core (Arachnid?) Power Mac replacement.  since the low end is also being serviced in this deal, I don&#8217;t see why they would want to switch to AMD, but then again in 2 years, who knows what will happen, I mean did you see any of this coming 5 years ago?  wait g4 tower time would be a bad example&#8230; anyways that&#8217;s enough ranting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarvpriya</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14118</link>
		<dc:creator>sarvpriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/#comment-14118</guid>
		<description>apple has shifted to intel chips few months back saying they were not satisfied by IBM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apple has shifted to intel chips few months back saying they were not satisfied by IBM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14108</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 06:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/#comment-14108</guid>
		<description>Ooops, guess I shouldn&#039;t write in the middle of the night just before driving 15 hours to Tucson. :)  Thanx everyone for the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, guess I shouldn&#8217;t write in the middle of the night just before driving 15 hours to Tucson. <img src='http://svenontech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Thanx everyone for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14105</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/#comment-14105</guid>
		<description>If Apple went AMD we&#039;d still be waiting for the transition due to the lack of a chipset, integrated graphics, wireless, and other things that you get &quot;for free&quot; buying from Intel.  Apple may go AMD when they decide to start designing their own motherboards again, but it would mean higher costs and longer lead times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple went AMD we&#8217;d still be waiting for the transition due to the lack of a chipset, integrated graphics, wireless, and other things that you get &#8220;for free&#8221; buying from Intel.  Apple may go AMD when they decide to start designing their own motherboards again, but it would mean higher costs and longer lead times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14092</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/#comment-14092</guid>
		<description>Apple has already gone Intel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has already gone Intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: won</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator>won</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/03/07/apple-to-go-amd-in-two-years/#comment-14091</guid>
		<description>&quot;...guess what? Apple will go Intel.&quot;

I think you mean the opposite :-)

Peace and love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;guess what? Apple will go Intel.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you mean the opposite <img src='http://svenontech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Peace and love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

