<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe: We Are Committed to OS X and Not Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://svenontech.com/2006/04/26/adobe-we-are-comitted-to-os-x-and-not-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/04/26/adobe-we-are-comitted-to-os-x-and-not-virtualization/</link>
	<description>The technology resource you can&#039;t resist!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/04/26/adobe-we-are-comitted-to-os-x-and-not-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-15029</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/04/26/adobe-we-are-comitted-to-os-x-and-not-virtualization/#comment-15029</guid>
		<description>Of course using those methods is not good for the majority of Mac users... that&#039;s because the majority are still using PowerPC.  When that shifts to Intel, it won&#039;t matter.

Also, is it significant that he said &#039;emulator?&#039;  Everything I&#039;ve heard and read makes very clear note this new stuff is not emulation but virtualization.  Emulation is the old VirtualPC for PowerPC, and I doubt many Mac users would ever run Photoshop in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course using those methods is not good for the majority of Mac users&#8230; that&#8217;s because the majority are still using PowerPC.  When that shifts to Intel, it won&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>Also, is it significant that he said &#8216;emulator?&#8217;  Everything I&#8217;ve heard and read makes very clear note this new stuff is not emulation but virtualization.  Emulation is the old VirtualPC for PowerPC, and I doubt many Mac users would ever run Photoshop in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Appleseed</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2006/04/26/adobe-we-are-comitted-to-os-x-and-not-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-15028</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Appleseed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2006/04/26/adobe-we-are-comitted-to-os-x-and-not-virtualization/#comment-15028</guid>
		<description>Mac users will keep buying the OS X versions, so developers will keep making them. Remember that most small-time Mac developers - who create most of the cool stuff - are Mac enthusiasts themselves and would never consider moving to Windows. For the bigger apps Apple might even release its Yellow Box developer tools to enable the creation of cross-platform apps without any extra effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac users will keep buying the OS X versions, so developers will keep making them. Remember that most small-time Mac developers &#8211; who create most of the cool stuff &#8211; are Mac enthusiasts themselves and would never consider moving to Windows. For the bigger apps Apple might even release its Yellow Box developer tools to enable the creation of cross-platform apps without any extra effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

