<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Flash Format&#8230;But the SQ is Smaller and Faster Than micro SD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://svenontech.com/2007/04/05/another-flash-formatbut-the-sq-is-smaller-and-faster-than-micro-sd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://svenontech.com/2007/04/05/another-flash-formatbut-the-sq-is-smaller-and-faster-than-micro-sd/</link>
	<description>The technology resource you can't resist!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2007/04/05/another-flash-formatbut-the-sq-is-smaller-and-faster-than-micro-sd/comment-page-1/#comment-121146</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2007/04/05/another-flash-formatbut-the-sq-is-smaller-and-faster-than-micro-sd/#comment-121146</guid>
		<description>It is not 2mm x 2mm, it is 20mm x 20mm x 2mm - see http://www.shareplayers.net/SQ/SQ%20Comparison%20Chart-Jan2007.pdf

This makes it (slightly) smaller (but thicker) than miniSD, and larger in all dimensions than microSD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not 2mm x 2mm, it is 20mm x 20mm x 2mm &#8211; see <a href="http://www.shareplayers.net/SQ/SQ%20Comparison%20Chart-Jan2007.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.shareplayers.net/SQ/SQ%20Comparison%20Chart-Jan2007.pdf</a></p>
<p>This makes it (slightly) smaller (but thicker) than miniSD, and larger in all dimensions than microSD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
