<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: SanDisk Cruzer Contour (4 GB)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://svenontech.com/2007/10/04/review-sandisk-cruzer-contour-4-gb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://svenontech.com/2007/10/04/review-sandisk-cruzer-contour-4-gb/</link>
	<description>The technology resource you can't resist!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Katt</title>
		<link>http://svenontech.com/2007/10/04/review-sandisk-cruzer-contour-4-gb/#comment-119895</link>
		<dc:creator>James Katt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svenontech.com/2007/10/04/review-sandisk-cruzer-contour-4-gb/#comment-119895</guid>
		<description>The SanDisk Cruzer Micro is better.  It has a buit-in keyring and a built-in sleeve so that you don't have to lose a cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SanDisk Cruzer Micro is better.  It has a buit-in keyring and a built-in sleeve so that you don&#8217;t have to lose a cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
